====== Kinetik ======


von [[autoren:nachname_vorname|Vorname Nachname]]

----

^ lat.    |      |^Synonyme        |      |
^ engl.   |      |^Gegenbegriffe   | |
^ franz.  |    |^Unterbegriffe   | |
^ Wortfeld| ||||

----

===== Disziplinäre Begriffe =====

---- 
===== Material =====

==== A. Primärmaterial ====

==== B. Sekundärmaterial ====
=== Begriffsgeschichtliche Arbeiten ===

  * Janich, P.: (Art.) Kinetik, in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hg.v. J. Ritter u. K. Gründer. Bd. 4, Basel/Stuttgart, 1976, Sp. 836 - 837.

=== Sonstige Literatur ===


  * Achinstein, Peter: Particels and Waves. Historical Essays in the Phylosophie of Science. New York, Oxford, 1991.
    * Rezension: Klaus Hentschel, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 44, 1994, S. 175-176.

  * Bernstein, Henry T.: J. Clerk Maxwell on the History of the Kinetic theory of Gases, 1871. Isis 54, 1963, S. 206-216.

  * De Regt, Henk W.: Philosophy and the Kinetic Theory of Gases. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 1996, S. 31-62. 

|Abstract: This article examines the role of philosophy in the development of the kinetic theory of gases. Two opposing accounts of this role, by Peter Clark and John Nyhof, are discussed and criticized. Contrary to both accounts, it is argued that philosophical views of scientists can fundamentally influence the results of their scientific work. This claim is supported by a detailed analysis of the philosophical views of Maxwell and Boltzmann, and of their work on the kinetic theory, especially concerning the so-called specific heat anomaly. It leads to the conclusion that the scientific development of the kinetic theory cannot be understood without taking into account the role of philosophy.|

  * Kappes, Mathias: Die Aristotelische Lehre über Begriff und Ursache der χίνησις. Eine naturphilosophische Studie. Bonn, 1887.

  * Liske, Michale-Thomas: Kinesis and Energia bei Aristoteles. Phronesis 36, 1991, S. 161-178.

  * Nyhof, John: Philosophical Objections to the Kinetic Theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 1988 S. 81-109. 

|Abstract: Towards the end of the 19th century there were those who wished to see the kinetic theory abandoned. This paper attempts to show that this reaction was primarily due to philosophical objections rather than the results of scientific difficulties encountered by the kinetic theory. First the relevant philosophical background is examined as well as the relation between the kinetic theory and thermodynamics. Next the scientific difficulty known as the specific heats ratio anomaly is discussed and finally Boltzmann's philosophy of science is examined.|


----
^ Kategorien: {{tag>}}  ^ ^ siehe alle Artikel von {{tag>Name_Vorname}} ^ siehe {{tag>Artikel_in_Arbeit}} ^