====== Trägheit ======

von [[autoren:nachname_vorname|Vorname Nachname]]

----

^ lat.    |      |^Synonyme        |      |
^ engl.   |      |^Gegenbegriffe   | |
^ franz.  |    |^Unterbegriffe   | |
^ Wortfeld| ||||

----

===== Disziplinäre Begriffe =====

---- 
===== Material =====

==== A. Primärmaterial ====

|**1677**|Ursula Renz nennt Spinozas Aussage, wonach „jedes Ding (...) in seinem Sein zu verharren strebt (Lehrsatz 7, 239)“, eine „Ontologisierung des physikalischen Satzes von der Bewegungserhaltung“, wie er auch in Descartes' Physik behauptet wird. Ursula Renz, „Zwischen ontologischer Notwendigkeit und zufälliger Semantik“, in: Hilge Landweer (Hg.), Gefühle – Struktur und Funktion, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2007, S.35-56, hier 42. (nach Ott)|
|**1745**|Zedler, Johann Heinrich: (Art.) [[http://mdz10.bib-bvb.de/~zedler/zedler2007/blaettern/einzelseite.html?id=400593&bandnummer=44&seitenzahl=0941&supplement=0&dateiformat=1|Trägheit]], in: Grosses vollständiges Universal Lexicon aller Wissenschafften und Künste, Bd. 44, S. 941-942.|
|**1839**|Gehler, Johann Samuel Traugott: (Art.) [[http://www.bsb-muenchen-digital.de/~web/web1013/bsb10131096/images/index.html?digID=bsb10131096&pimage=257&v=2p&nav=0&l=de|Trägheit]], in: Johann Samuel Traugott Gehler’s Physikalisches Wörterbuch. Bd. 9,2. Leipzig, 1839. S. 1073-1075.|

==== B. Sekundärmaterial ====
=== Begriffsgeschichtliche Arbeiten ===

  * Hühn, H., Jammer, M.: (Art.) Trägheit, in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hg. v. J. Ritter u. K. Gründer. Bd. 10, Basel, 1998, Sp. 1329 - 1334.

=== Sonstige Literatur ===

  * Detel, Wolfgang: Eine Notiz zum Trägheitsbegriff bei Galilei. Sudhoffs Archiv, 59, 1975, S. 415-420.

  * Elazar, Michael: Honoré Fabri and the Trojan Horse of Inertia. Science in Context 21, 2008 S. 1-38. 

|Abstract: This paper discusses the theory of motion of the philosopher Honoré Fabri (1608–1688), a senior representative of early modern Jesuit scientists. It argues that the consensus prevailing among historians – according to which Fabri's theory of impetus is diametrically opposed to Galileo's or Descartes' concept of inertia – is false. It shows: that Fabri carefully constructed his concept of impetus in order to easily incorporate the principle of linear conservation of motion (designated here as “limited inertia”), by adopting formal (rather than efficient) causality between impetus and motion and by allowing impetus to act only along straight lines; that he explicitly deemed Aristotle's famous “inertial paradox” not as a paradox at all; and that linear conservation of motion was not limited to “counterfactual” circumstances but played a significant part in his discrete theory of free fall and constituted an integral component of his general physical (and even mathematical) philosophy. However, the paper also shows that Fabri's notion of inertia was restricted to one dimension only, and therefore should indeed be considered “limited.” In his analysis of horizontal projectiles, Fabri explicitly rejected Galileo's important principle of superposition, and thus revealed significant constraints to his “inertial” thinking. |

  * Grant, Edward: Motion in the Void and the Principle of Inertia in the Middle Ages. Isis 55, 1964, S. 265-292

  * Ihmig, Karl Norbert: Trägheit und Massebegriff bei Johannes Kepler. Philosophia Naturalis 27, 1990, S. 156-205.

  * Kalman, Calvin. A Role for Experiment in Using the Law of Inertia to Explain the Nature of Science: A Comment on Lopes Celho. Science & Education 18/1, 2009, S. 25-31. 

|Abstract: The whole mode of Galileo’s discovery of the Law of Inertia is an excellent exemplar of the Nature of Science. The law can, moreover be shown to be a direct consequence of the hypothesis that space is homogeneous and isotropic and time is homogeneous. |

  * O’Brien, James F.: Some Medieval anticipations of inertia. The New Scholasticism 44, 1970, S. 345-371.

  * Pav, Peter Anton: Gassendi's Statement of the Principle of Inertia. Isis 57, 1966, S. 24-34.

  * Rochot, B.: Beckmann, Gassendi et le principe d’inertie. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 5, 1952, S. 282-289.

  * Silver Bruce: Berkeley and the Principle of Inertia. Journal of the History of Ideas, 34.4 (1973) S. 599-608. [[http://www.jstor.org/pss/2708891|Vorschau]] 

----
^ Kategorien: {{tag>Physik}}  ^ ^ siehe alle Artikel von {{tag>Name_Vorname}} ^ siehe {{tag>Artikel_in_Arbeit}} ^
