====== Redaktion Artikel Komplementarität ======
===== Allgemeines =====

Verfasser: Felix Kurt Ernst Schmelzer

Koautor:

Redaktionell verantwortlich:

Abgabetermin:

Autorenabsprachen: Projektvorstellung (Komplementarität. Die Metaphernlehre der christlichen Mystik im Kontext einer kulturwissenschaftlichen Expertise' am 8.4.2013. Möglichkeit eines Artikels angesprochen.

Expertisen: 

Bemerkungen:


===== Stand der Redaktionsarbeit =====



bei jedem Neueintrag Signatur nicht vergessen:  --- //[[hetzer@zfl-berlin.org|Susanne Hetzer]] 2008/11/27 11:36//

===== Internes Material =====

==== B. Sekundärmaterial ====
=== Sonstige Literatur ===


  * Jahn, R.G.: The Complementarity of Consciousness. EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing 3/3 (2007) S. 307-310

|Abstract: The concept of complementarity, originally proposed by Bohr in a microphysical context, and subsequently extended by himself, Heisenberg and Pauli to encompass subjective as well as objective dimensions of human experience, can be further expanded to apply to many common attitudes of human consciousness. At issue is the replacement of strict polar opposition of superficially antithetical consciousness capacities, such as analysis and synthesis, logic and intuition, or doing and being, by more generous conjugation that allows the pairs to operate in constructive triangulation and harmony. In this format, the physical principle of uncertainty also acquires metaphoric relevance in limiting the attainable sharpness of specification of any consciousness complements, and may serve to define their optimum balance in establishing reality. These principles thus lend themselves to representation of wave-like vs. particle-like operations of consciousness; to trade-offs between rigor and ambience in consciousness research; to generic masculine/feminine reinforcement; and to the interplay of science and spirit in any creative enterprise.|


  * Katsumori, Makoto: Complementarity and Deconstruction: Plotnitsky's Analysis and Beyond. Configurations 12/3 (2004) S. 435-476.

|Abstract: The philosophical thought of the modern physicist Niels Bohr (1885-1962), which revolves around the concept of complementarity, has long been a major subject of historical and philosophical inquiry. Many prior studies of Bohr's complementarity, however, seem to be limited by the fact that they largely proceed within the conceptual frames of the "mainstream" philosophy of science. This being the case, his radical questioning of traditional scientific and philosophical notions -- such as the unambiguity of concepts and words -- has not been adequately addressed, insofar as these notions are uncritically presupposed by the commentators themselves. In other words, Bohr's thought has often been interpreted under certain tacit premises of scientific rationality that are precisely of the kind targeted by his epistemological critique. In recent years, however, there have emerged new approaches to Bohr's idea of complementarity that place it in different, less conventional, philosophical contexts. Among the most notable of these is Arkady Plotnitsky's endeavor to connect Bohr's complementarity with Jacques Derrida's project of deconstruction. In the present article, based on (...)|
